The Legal Basis of Response to Intervention: Analysis and Implications

Help with Listen Feature Help with Listen Feature

September 2013

RtIAbout this Article

The Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEIA) of 2004 makes significant and controversial changes to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Two very significant changes in this law are provisions that (a) allow school districts to spend up to 15% of their IDEA Part B funds on early intervening services in general education settings and (b) prohibit states from requiring that school districts use discrepancy formulas to determine if students are eligible for special education services in the category of learning disabilities. Additionally, Congress recommended that school districts use a response to intervention procedure in both early intervening services and for the identification of students with learning disabilities. In this article we first describe two significant reports that recommended that Congress abandon the current eligibility system in special education for students with high-incidence disabilities. Second we explain how Congress and the U.S. Department of Education changed the special education eligibility system for learning disabilities in the IDEIA and the regulations that implemented the IDEIA. Third we review due process hearings and court cases that have addressed response to intervention. Fourth we offer recommendations to teachers, administrators, and teacher trainers to ensure that they meet the letter and spirit of these new requirements of the IDEIA.[ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Back to top

General Information

Read the article:

APA Citation:  Yell, M. L., & Walker, D. W. (2010). The legal basis of response to intervention: Analysis and implications. Exceptionality, 18(3), 124-137.

Authors: Yell, Mitchell L. & Walker, David W.

Title:   The Legal Basis of Response to Intervention: Analysis and Implications

Year:   2010

Journal:  Exceptionality: A Special Education Journal

Publisher:  Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group

Volume: 18

Issue: 3

Pages:  124-137

Back to top

Is this article copyrighted?

Yes. NICHCY expresses its appreciation to Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group for its generous permission to post this article on our website.

While material produced by NICHCY is copyright free, this article is not. The original publisher of this article Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group holds the copyright to the article, whether in print or electronic form. You may view, download, print, or save the article’s content for the purposes of research, teaching, and/or private study. Please do not reproduce, post, redistribute, sell, modify, or create a derivative work of this content without prior, express written permission of the publisher.
For permission to reprint or copy this article, contact Exceptionality: A Special Education Journal, RoutledgeMortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T  3JH, UK or
NOTICE: NICHCY is going away, but its resources are not. Find hundreds of legacy NICHCY publications, as well as our training curriculum on IDEA 2004, in the Center for Parent Information and Resources' Library at This website will remain available until September 30, 2014. After that date, web visitors will be automatically redirected to