The Remedial Authority of Hearing and Review Officers Under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: An Update

Help with Listen Feature Help with Listen Feature

April 2012

 

About this Article

This article provides an update of a comprehensive review that the Administrative Law Review published five years ago, which synthesized the various sources of law specific to the remedial authority of hearing/review officers (H/ROs) under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA).  The publisher of the Administrative Law Review, which contained the original version, provided permission for the updated publication here.

The cornerstone for resolving disputes between parents and districts as to eligibility, FAPE, and other issues under IDEA is an impartial administrative adjudication conducted by a hearing/review officer (H/RO). Yet IDEA is largely silent about the boundaries of remedial authority that H/ROs  have to grant relief to aggrieved parties as state and federal courts do (e.g., tuition reimbursement, compensatory education). Using sources such as pertinent court decisions, published H/RO decisions, and interpretations of the Department of Education’s Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) to date, this article updates a comprehensive synthesis published five years ago of the legal basis and boundaries of H/ROs’ remedial authority under IDEA and state special education laws.

Back to top

General Information

Read the article: http://nichcy.org/wp-content/uploads/docs/journals/zirkel3.pdf

APA Citation:  Zirkel, P. (2011).  The remedial authority of hearing and review officers under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: An update. Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary, 31, 1-43.

Author: Zirkel, Perry A.

Title:  The Remedial Authority of Hearing and Review Officers Under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: An Update.

Year:   2011

Journal:  Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary

Publisher:  National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary

Volume: 31

Issue: 1

Pages:  1-43

Back to top 

Is this article copyrighted?

Yes.  NICHCY expresses its appreciation to the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary for its generous permission to post this article on our website.

While material produced by NICHCY is copyright free, this article is not. The original publisher of this article the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary holds the copyright to the article, whether in print or electronic form. You may view, download, print, or save the article’s content for the purposes of research, teaching, and/or private study. Please do not reproduce, post, redistribute, sell, modify, or create a derivative work of this content without prior, express written permission of the publisher.
 
For permission to reprint or copy this article, contact the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary.
 
NOTICE: NICHCY is going away, but its resources are not. Find hundreds of legacy NICHCY publications, as well as our training curriculum on IDEA 2004, in the Center for Parent Information and Resources' Library at http://www.parentcenterhub.org/resources. This website will remain available until September 30, 2014. After that date, web visitors will be automatically redirected to http://www.parentcenterhub.org.